Talking Points: Back to the future cities and design that fails
Each fortnight we round-up some of the latest news, research, and reports that are shaping our thinking. These are things that have led to an interesting conversation at Design Council HQ. Add to the conversation in the comments below.
The future of future cities
Once every twenty years, the UN hosts its Habitat Conference – where countries gather to think about the urban design of future cities. Habitat 2 took place in 1996 whilst England were being knocked out of the Euros on penalties; Habitat 3 took place last week.
The most important people in the world have been busy agreeing that good design is essential (glad they agree). The discussions varied: from debating the definition of a city, to making more climate-friendly toilets. Luckily we’ve got until 2036 to catch up on everything we missed.
Designing for not-quite-everyone
A little closer to home, the impact of bad design has been a hot topic. The Equalities Select Committee has stated that the built environment “still creates barriers for many disabled people”, following a major inquiry. We agree. You can read all the responses to the inquiry, including Design Council’s, here.
Meanwhile, a Parliamentary office has helpfully pulled together all the evidence related to green space and health. The headline is: green space is very important for health. Unfortunately, access to it is not evenly distributed, and poor people get the worst deal. Meanwhile, the CLG committee are looking at access to public parks, against fears that they’re under threat.
The same data is included in a report by ex-arts minister Lord Baker, who also lists the areas of D&T most under threat. The biggest relative decline has been in ‘Systems and Control Technology’, which has fallen by 47% since 2009; though many will be more concerned by the drops in the larger courses, such as Resistant Materials. Lord Baker’s solution is a new Baccalaureate which includes D&T. The proposals got short shrift in parliament last week.
Other interesting things we read this week:
- The much-discussed evaluation of the Troubled Families programme, which shows that the government forgot that classic design rule: fail early, fail cheap.
- Some good news in the intellectual property world. As of 1 October 2016, registering rights with the IPO will be cheaper for designers. The IPO also recently told us that companies are spending more on design-type assets than before.
- The fact that the Danish Design Centre is planning to work with 1000 SMEs in 1000 days
- This interesting blog about the accessibility of typography in information design
- This Centre for Cities report which says that UK cities (except London) are lagging behind on skills and innovation, compared to those in Europe
- This Harvard Business Review article which asks, “do we need to expand our definition of entrepreneurship?”
- Finally, this year’s Ig Nobel prize in economics went to a study on the brand personality of rocks. This Twitter account about design thinking might be a future candidate.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Want to keep up with the latest from the Design Council?